Mario, I think I raised this previously, that perhaps one glyph should resort to the element being equal to the symbol.
Why? Because a large set of possibilities are opened up even without using the customise pragma just some defaults. Eg; 'tr would expect /tr and wrap the content in <tr></tr> Without any further customisation. ie; the symbol is automatically adopted as the _element Sure this can be customised however there are many cases where this, and perhaps a .classname is more than enough Of course another glyph that does the same automatically terminates on /n would also help eg; 'tr °td contents of table detail /tr °li contents of list item °li.bold bold contents of list item This is another way to help html/css savy users to make use of this solution right out of the box with no customising. I could look from some appropriate glyphs rather than the above ' and ° Regards Tones On Saturday, 7 November 2020 09:39:43 UTC+11, TonyM wrote: > > Mario, > > That's why I favour customised 'tr and /tr but then you have to be > familiar with html tables. > > Regards > Tony > > On Friday, 6 November 2020 21:13:23 UTC+11, PMario wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I did a bit more docs for table formatting. So there are the same >> formatting options as available with standard wikitext. >> The only problem is, to find good "start" and "end" symbols, to make the >> wikitext readable. >> >> -m >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/4e820d69-5200-4e8b-9a93-0503c2a0390co%40googlegroups.com.
