*Note On Custom Embedded Font* Frankly I think that ultimately a custom (very small) font of ONLY markup glyphs is the BEST solution.
TonyM has shown that much of the time the normal font cascade on Windows will usually (but not determinately) work. However there are additional issues even when it does. The main issue being that different fonts have *different design styles .* I think it far better that ALL CustomMarkup Glyphs are visually consistent in design. Much better experience. And I think it important we can GUARANTEE that the Glyphs are available in TW so it will work on all platforms without complications. Regarding SIZE I will comment more later, but as far as I tested the CMFont would be no more than 10-30kb Best wishes TT -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywikidev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/eba1cbf0-0d2f-4e48-baea-3b7371f1ce90n%40googlegroups.com.
