Also, a couple of questions regarding this list: (1) I tried to join it a couple of weeks ago, but it never sent me a confirmation, and now it appears that all of my messages are being held for moderator approval.
(2) Can we re-configure it such that replies go to the list? It is a pain to modify the To: field each time I reply. Pierre Ossman wrote: > On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 04:11:19 -0500 > DRC <dcomman...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > > >> The build system in TigerVNC unfortunately seems to require autoconf >> 2.61 or higher and also a later version of automake than is available on >> even the latest Enterprise Linux system (CentOS 5.2.) Thus, I cannot >> build the software, nor can anyone else running Enterprise Linux. I >> would suggest checking the configure script into the SVN repository. >> The RealVNC source code does this. It will give advanced users the >> option to chance the autoconf files as they see fit but will not require >> the use of autoconf/automake for the more mundane builds of the software. >> >> > > Checking in generated files is always a slippery slope, so I'm against > this. > > But I don't see why we need a newer autoconf than what CentOS ships. > Does anyone know? That's the issue that should be fixed IMO. > > Rgds > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Tigervnc-devel mailing list Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
