I am a GNU Make hacker, so I personally use raw GNU Makefile semantics for VirtualGL and other projects I do, but I am a bit of a nut in that regard. :) In terms of automated Makefile generators, CMake is a much more elegant solution than automake IMHO.
However, I'm not proposing for TigerVNC to do either of the above. I just want to use a version of automake/autoconf that is more compatible with Enterprise Linux platforms. My users are mostly standardized on Enterprise Linux 3, 4, and 5 with a few on SuSE 9 & 10 and Ubuntu 7 & 8. These are mostly large corporations and institutions that will refuse to change platforms until they absolutely cannot get support for it anymore. Thus, I need to build on the "lowest common denominator" platform to ensure that I can distribute one binary that works for everyone. Constantin Kaplinsky wrote: > Hello Darrell, > > >>>>>> DRC wrote: >>>>>> > > >> This is exactly why I hate autoconf/automake and will not use them in >> my own projects. >> > > Is there any good substitution for autoconf/automake available? > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging. Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com _______________________________________________ Tigervnc-devel mailing list Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
