On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 15:41:36 -0400 Brian Long <briandl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I was also under the impression that the FLTK patches were not required to > build TigerVNC, but I found out I couldn't build it properly. That's when > I pursued using FLTK 1.3 + patches. I could not easily determine which > patches to apply and in which order. I downloaded the latest patches from > each mentioned URL, but they all didn't apply cleanly. > Could you list the errors you got? Note that the patches are to be applied on FLTK revision 9619, not 1.3.0. BUILDING.txt has instructions on how to get that specific revision. > It would be nice to get TigerVNC 1.2.x working on Mountain Lion. Right now > I'm using Chicken and OS X Screen Sharing, both of which are not as nice > and have some issues (Chicken 2.2b2 does not interact well with TigerVNC > Server 0.9.x on RHEL 6). Unfortunately neither Chicken nor Screen Sharing are proper VNC. They've modified the protocol in incompatible ways, mainly with regards to keyboard handling. Rgds -- Pierre Ossman Software Development Cendio AB http://cendio.com Teknikringen 8 http://twitter.com/ThinLinc 583 30 Linköping http://facebook.com/ThinLinc Phone: +46-13-214600 http://plus.google.com/112509906846170010689 A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct
_______________________________________________ Tigervnc-users mailing list Tigervnc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-users
