Sebastian Spaeth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Frederik Ramm wrote: >> Hi, >> >>> The context was lowzoom, so definitely lower than z12. It really would >>> be good to have better projection in both osmarenders, that's the core >>> reason we do so many rasterizer calls too, isn't it? >> >> What ever became of the "mercatorize" preprocessor? That would feed >> northings/eastings into anything further down the line and remove the >> need for projection in orp/osmarender altogether... > > It was never used by anything, so I removed it a few weeks ago. (I was > thinking we should rather combine preprocessors rather than have yet one > more perl script going through the whole data once more). Should still > be in the attic as mercatorize.pl or similar :-).
I don't think preprocessors are a problem. Have one tool for one task. But, preprocessors could also be implemented as class modules. Matthias _______________________________________________ Tilesathome mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tilesathome
