Matthias Julius <lists <at> julius-net.net> writes: >>The Osmarender map is much more frequent but doesn't have highlighting for >>unnamed roads. Do you think that could be added in the same style as NoName?
>Aren't those streets highlighted on the maplint layer? I think that is only for residential streets, but names are needed for almost all roads, including unclassified roads. (Unless the maplint rule residential-without-name is misnamed.) A small improvement would be to not print the text 'residential-without-name' every time the rule matches, but just highlight the edges of the street. For the other maplint rules the text is useful, but this rule is by far the most common and omitting the text would make the map less cluttered and leave room for writing in street names on a printout. The maplint layer can be more out of date than the NoName map, for example here: <http://openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.5684&lon=-0.02009&zoom=17&layers=B000TTF> some street names and a missing way were added a couple of weeks ago but maplint is old. Then again, the Osmarender tiles are old too so I am not sure what happened. -- Ed Avis <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Tilesathome mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tilesathome
