Ed Avis <[email protected]> writes: > Sebastian Spaeth <sebastian <at> sspaeth.de> writes: > >>The astethetic is in the eye of the beholder. While it is true that >>osmarender shows more than mapnik, some prefer the osmarender look and >>use it as their regular map. > > Heh. I would switch to Osmarender as my regular map if it had highlighting > for > no-name streets, since I like to take the opportunity to add extra data when > possible. > > A missing street name is something that can always be fixed, so it doesn't > clutter the finished map - only a partially-mapped area.
Not all streets have names. Barely any street in Germany that is outside of a town/village has a name. I think it is only relatively safe to assume that residential streets should have names. And I guess this is why maplint only warns about those if they don't. Please, don't suggest to add no-name tags to all those streets to get them not highlighted. And again, osmarender is not a debug map. It is about showing what is there and not what is not there ;-) Matthias _______________________________________________ Tilesathome mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tilesathome
