What makes me wonder: Why don't they adapt the DCF77 implementation? Is
it the not invented here syndrome?
At it looks like they never heard of Kasami sequences.
Dennis Ferguson schrieb:
On 18 Mar, 2012, at 10:52 , John Seamons wrote:
They do talk about using the 11-bit Barker code for autocorrelation. But the
sync bits transmitted only match the Barker code if you interpret them a little
The part of the paper that talked about the Barker code confused me
somewhat since I couldn't quite figure out how it was relevant. The
autocorrelation property of the Barker code is only interesting if
the Barker code is the only thing being sent (over and over), but
in this case the concerns are more about spurious correlations with
the variable data, something for which no solution seems to be
time-nuts mailing list -- firstname.lastname@example.org
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.