> Peter,
> 
> That depends. To use 1M Ohms input impedance, you need a 50 Ohms series 
> impedance at the driver chip. Most sources such as the 58503A and Thunderbolt 
> violate that requirement by having only a couple of Ohms output impedance, 
> and are thus not suitable and do need the 50 Ohms termination at the scope 
> least you get horrible ringing as shown in Tom's plots from yesterday.
> 
> However that means you are pumping up to 100mA through your coax, and scope 
> termination. That makes your coax ground jump many 10's of millivolts 
> (depending on cable length and quality). This IR induced ground jump now also 
> shows up on your 10MHz coax and messes with that signal, as the 1PPS return 
> current partially goes through the 10MHz coax shield and generates a voltage 
> rise on the shield. It's a cluster....
> 
> You can take a multimeter and actually measure the voltage drop on your coax 
> cable shield from one connector to the other. On units with longer 1PPS pulse 
> you see the multimeter twitch once per second (Symmetricom XLI for example) 
> even on a short 1m cable.
> 
> But if you look at Tom's plots you see that there is some high frequency 
> ringing on the 58503A 1PPS when terminated into 1M, I am not sure thats 
> coming from cable reflections. For those high frequency rings a 1G scope may 
> be better to see what's really going on in the driver.
> 
> Think about it this way: why would you want to drive a 50 Ohms coax with a 5 
> Ohms output impedance? That's an absolutely horrible impedance mismatch. But 
> that is what the Trimble Thunderbolt does, and likely also the Resolution-T.. 
> Resulting in ringing up to 10V on your cable.
> 
> Bye,
> Said
> 
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
> On Sep 14, 2014, at 9:04, "Peter Reilley" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> I tried removing the termination and got a little better than 4 nS
>> risetime.
>> 
>> Isn't the ringing frequency simply a function of the length of
>> the coax?   Isn't it the price you pay for mismatched impedances?
>> 
>> Pete.
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: time-nuts [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Said
>> Jackson via time-nuts
>> Sent: Sunday, September 14, 2014 11:43 AM
>> To: Said Jackson; Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
>> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Correcting jitter on the 1 PPS
>> signalfromaGPSreceiver.
>> 
>> Ok, did the math, a 4ns risetime should be ok on a 200MHz scope.
>> 
>> You likely won't see the oscillations and reflections visible in Toms 58503A
>> plots for example, they are faster than the risetime.
>> 
>> Bye,
>> Said
>> 
>> Sent From iPhone
>> 
>>> On Sep 14, 2014, at 8:35, Said Jackson via time-nuts <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Peter,
>>> 
>>> You don't need nor do you want a 50 ohms end-termination on a
>> series-terminated 50 ohms coax cable.
>>> 
>>> This has been discussed here extensively before, please check the
>> archives. Your last sentence is not correct.
>>> 
>>> Also, you are running into your scope's BW limit if you are measuring a
>> 4ns risetime with a 200MHz scope..
>>> 
>>> Bye,
>>> Said
>>> 
>>> Sent From iPhone
>>> 
>>>> On Sep 14, 2014, at 6:19, "Peter Reilley" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> My rise time is about 4 nS.   I am measuring that with my 200 MHz
>>>> scope.   I am only using 50 Ohm termination, anything else is not
>>>> valid when using 50 Ohm coax. 
>>>> 
>>>> Pete.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: time-nuts [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tom 
>>>> Van Baak
>>>> Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2014 10:34 PM
>>>> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
>>>> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Correcting jitter on the 1 PPS signal 
>>>> fromaGPSreceiver.
>>>> 
>>>>> The cables are not exactly the same lengths.   Differences in length
>>>>> will result in a fixed offset.   I am not concerned about such fixed
>>>>> errors, only jitter.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I am comparing the rising edges which is what the spec defines as 
>>>>> the reference edge.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Pete.
>>>> 
>>>> Pete,
>>>> 
>>>> Correct, the survey position is determined only by the phase center 
>>>> of the antenna, not by cable length. And cable length mismatches 
>>>> should make no difference in your jitter measurements.
>>>> 
>>>> But one thing to check is how sharp the 1PPS rising edge is -- right 
>>>> at the input to your TI counter. I use a BNC tee with one leg open 
>>>> allowing a 'scope check (set to 1M input). If your risetime is a 
>>>> couple of ns like mine is, then all is well. Slow risetime can be a huge
>> source of timing jitter.
>>>> Check both 50R and 1M at the counter input. Use DC, not AC coupling. 
>>>> Use fixed trigger, never auto-trigger. Pick a trigger level that 
>>>> matches the maximum slope.
>>>> 
>>>> Some examples of good/bad GPS 1PPS risetimes:
>>>> http://leapsecond.com/pages/gpsdo-rise/
>>>> 
>>>> /tvb
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to 
>>>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>>> and follow the instructions there.
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to 
>>>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>>> and follow the instructions there.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to 
>>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>> and follow the instructions there.
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to
>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
>> 
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to