Hi,

On 11/27/2015 05:03 PM, Tom Van Baak wrote:
They mentioned some "6 miles per day" offset due to GPS relativity effects.
I think this is the sum of both special relativity (time dilation) and
general relativity (gravitational) effects. The GR correction is 45
microseconds a day fast; the SR correction is 7 microseconds slow. 38
microseconds seconds is 11 kilometers which is indeed 6 or 7 miles. While
time drifts 38 microseconds a day, I'm not sure that GPS coordinates would
drift that fast - aren't most of the corrections in the same direction?

Hi Tim,

Correct. Here's from the "rel" program (in my http://leapsecond.com/tools/ 
folder):

C:\tvb\NPR>rel 20000km 14000kph
** Altitude 20000000.000 m (65616797.900 ft, 12427.424 mi) 5.274e-010 blueshift
   1898630.424377 ps/hour
     45567.130185 ns/day
** Velocity 3888.889 m/s (14000.000 km/h, 8699.197 mph) -8.414e-011 redshift
   -302888.070815 ps/hour
     -7269.313700 ns/day
** Net effect (GR+SR) 4.433e-010 shift
   1595742.353562 ps/hour
     38297.816485 ns/day

What this means is that as a *source of UTC*, GPS would in fact be off by 38 us 
per day if you forgot about relativity when you designed it.

But, you're right, you cannot blindly turn that "38 us/day" into "11 km/day". 
As long as *all* the GPS clocks are running too fast or too slow and as long as the receivers know 
what that offset is, the navigation system would still work just fine, relativity or not. This is 
true for any sort of triangulation (actually, trilateration) system.

GPS is a PNT (Position, Navigation, and Timing) system. So while GPS is really cool, and 
relativity is really cool, the navigation part of GPS does not "depend" on 
relativity, per-se.

As found in IS-GPS-200H:

http://www.gps.gov/technical/icwg/IS-GPS-200H.pdf

8<---
3.3.1.1 Frequency Plan.
For Block IIA, IIR, IIR-M, and IIF satellites, the requirements specified in this IS shall pertain to the signal contained within two 20.46 MHz bands; one centered about the L1 nominal frequency and the other centered about the L2 nominal frequency (see Table 3-Vb). For GPS III and subsequent satellites, the requirements specified in this IS shall pertain to the signal contained within two 30.69 MHz bands; one centered about the L1 nominal frequency and the other centered about the L2 nominal frequency (see Table 3-Vc). The carrier frequencies for the L1 and L2 signals shall be coherently derived from a common frequency source within the SV. The nominal frequency of this source -- as it appears to an observer on the ground -- is 10.23 MHz. The SV carrier frequency and clock rates -- as they would appear to an observer located in the SV -- are offset to compensate for relativistic effects. The clock rates are offset by ∆ f/f = -4.4647E-10, equivalent to a change in the P-code chipping rate of 10.23 MHz offset by a ∆f = -4.5674E-3 Hz. This is equal to 10.2299999954326 MHz. The nominal carrier frequencies (f0)
shall be 1575.42 MHz, and 1227.6 MHz for L1 and L2, respectively.
--->8

There is however relativistic effects that the user equipment must compensate for, as it depends on the position of the user observation and shifts will be different for each user or for that matter for the user the shift will be different for each satellite.

Cheers,
Magnus
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to