On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 23:36:55 +0200
Magnus Danielson <mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org> wrote:
> To this day, the 1.001 factor haunts us in all modern hardware and
> timing designs, including the latest synchronization standards.
> It's fascinating that we have been simulating several centuries into the
> future to ensure that the algorithms for the synchronization will make
> the 1.001 factor keep working as intended. I wrote one such simulator
> being used.
So, you are doing the inverse of a programmer archeologist?
On a more more serious note: what exactly have you been simulating?
And how does this frequency make a difference?
Any simple idea will be worded in the most complicated way.
time-nuts mailing list -- email@example.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.