On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 23:36:55 +0200
Magnus Danielson <mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org> wrote:

> To this day, the 1.001 factor haunts us in all modern hardware and 
> timing designs, including the latest synchronization standards.
> It's fascinating that we have been simulating several centuries into the 
> future to ensure that the algorithms for the synchronization will make 
> the 1.001 factor keep working as intended. I wrote one such simulator 
> being used.

So, you are doing the inverse of a programmer archeologist[1]? 

SCNR :-)

On a more more serious note: what exactly have you been simulating?
And how does this frequency make a difference?

                        Attila Kinali

[1] http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/4424
Malek's Law:
        Any simple idea will be worded in the most complicated way.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to