-------- In message <CAGJ4F+697SyXwm3yWG-XczN4zF7r2RAmXzAcEm=dhaqbjc_...@mail.gmail.com>, "Deirdre O'Byrne" writes:
>MSF disciplined oscillator?! I don't trust these receivers to any better >than about the 20ms mark, so such a disciplined oscillator would have quite >a long integration time! It's actually more complicated and better than that. The low-pass filter dominates, so the falling flank at second N depends on the pulsewidth at second N-1. I can't remember the numbers I got when I "sorted" DCF77 pulses depending on the previous pulse being short or long, but it was a fair bit better than 20ms. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
