kb...@n1k.org said:
> Yes, but looping back to the start of this thread, the intent is to actually
> measure the jitter directly.  That’s where the whole need for a stamped
> pulse comes from. To paraphrase the earlier comments, the intent is to get
> away from a “self reported” result and actually do a direct measurement.  

I think that should be a reasonable project.

1) Write some code to grab the time, send a pulse, grab the time.  Log that.
2) Use a time-stamp counter to log the time of the pulse.
3) Write the software to merge the two log files.

These are my opinions.  I hate spam.

time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to