> If you mean 'how server quality was measured for the scoring algorithm > of pool.ntp.org', then that was only in the very beginning. ntpd > quickly gets unstable (time jumps around a lot) when there are > more than 50 or 100 servers configured, so I'd have needed a pretty > large monitoring server network. Lazyness made me not pursue this, > changing to 'ntpdate'-type single requests without all the fancy > statistics that ntpd does.
Has anybody tried the noselect option on the servers they want to monitor? -- The suespammers.org mail server is located in California. So are all my other mailboxes. Please do not send unsolicited bulk e-mail or unsolicited commercial e-mail to my suespammers.org address or any of my other addresses. These are my opinions, not necessarily my employer's. I hate spam. _______________________________________________ timekeepers mailing list [email protected] https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers
