On Thursday 25 October 2007, Evandro Menezes wrote: > IMO, I think that iburst should be limited to high-bandwidth servers. The lowest number servers, e.g., 0.uk.pool.ntp.org, have ussually higher bandwidth than higher number servers, e.g., 1.uk.pool.ntp.org. Therefore, I only add the iburst option to the 0th server and let NTP adjust for minor differences between this and better servers. >
good idea. since i dont use the pool myself but am in it, it is difficult to tell which are high bandwidth. since several of the servers are various nist.gov servers i expect them all to be high bandwidth. > HTH > > > -- > __________________________________________________________________ > Evandro Menezes Austin, TX http://themenezes.us > > > > _______________________________________________ > timekeepers mailing list > [email protected] > https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers > -- Chuck "...and the hordes of M$*ft users descended upon me in their anger, and asked 'Why do you not get the viruses or the BlueScreensOfDeath or insecure system troubles and slowness or pay through the nose for an OS as *we* do?!!', and I answered...'I use Linux'. " The Book of John, chapter 1, page 1, and end of book _______________________________________________ timekeepers mailing list [email protected] https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers
