Aron, I really would love to help you but I know nothing about ELF. From your mail, I'm only able to tall that s (0x4) from: $2 = {s = 0x4, offset = 0, new_section = 45 '-', link_once = 0 '\000'} Is not a valid address to allow to take sh_num. Don't ask me why.
sm_table[sh->sh_info].s->sh_num; Are you able to trace why/who set this value to 4? C. -----Original Message----- From: Tinycc-devel [mailto:tinycc-devel-bounces+eligis=orange...@nongnu.org] On Behalf Of Barath Aron Sent: dimanche 23 décembre 2018 10:23 To: tinycc-devel@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] When is planned to be released the next version of Tcc? Scroll back to my mail dated on 12/3/18, 5:34 PM for details of the crash. On 12/23/18 10:07 AM, Christian Jullien wrote: > Ouch! I don’t know about ARCH ARM Linux, I can just say it works nicely on > RPi ARM board: > > jullien@sims3:~ $ tcc -v > tcc version 0.9.27 (ARM Hard Float Linux) > > jullien@sims3:~ $ uname -a > Linux sims3 4.14.89-v7+ #1182 SMP Tue Dec 18 00:35:25 GMT 2018 armv7l > GNU/Linux > > jullien@sims3:~ $ cat hello1.c > #include <stdio.h> > > int main(int argc, char* argv[]) > { > printf("Hello World!\n"); > return 0; > } > jullien@sims3:~ $ tcc hello1.c > jullien@sims3:~ $ ./a.out > Hello World! > > This tcc version allows me to pass my Lisp compiler huge non regression test > suite. > > > From: Tinycc-devel [mailto:tinycc-devel-bounces+eligis=orange...@nongnu.org] > On Behalf Of Barath Aron > Sent: dimanche 23 décembre 2018 09:23 > To: tinycc-devel@nongnu.org > Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] When is planned to be released the next version > of Tcc? > > Let we argue about the "almost bug free" thing. I have a major issue with > 0.9.27: > > $ tcc -v > tcc version 0.9.27 (ARM Linux) > > $ uname -a > Linux alarm 4.18.13-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Thu Oct 11 02:22:56 UTC 2018 armv7l > GNU/Linux > > $ cat hello1.c > #include <stdio.h> > > int main(int argc, char* argv[]) > { > printf("Hello World!\n"); > return 0; > } > > $ tcc hello1.c > Segmentation fault (core dumped) > > I suppose this is not the intended behavior. Same effect with official > package and with mob. > (I already reported this bug, but it seems nobody cares.) > > Aron > > On 12/23/18 8:25 AM, Christian Jullien wrote: > I’m not the maintainer of tcc but I’ve no sign of a new version anytime soon. > What I can say however is that: > - 0.9.27 released last year is damn good and almost bug free on supported > platforms (I personally tested) > - Since last release, tcc activity has been rather low and I see no real > reasons to publish a 0.9.28 > - I you want the latest version, I invite you to use mod which is also very > stable. > - As a general rule for a new version is that it comes out … when it’s ready > > M2c > > From: Tinycc-devel [mailto:tinycc-devel-bounces+eligis=orange...@nongnu.org] > On Behalf Of Kantor Zsolt > Sent: samedi 22 décembre 2018 14:52 > To: tinycc-devel@nongnu.org > Subject: [Tinycc-devel] When is planned to be released the next version of > Tcc? > > The question is in the subject. > > Thanks. > > > _______________________________________________ > Tinycc-devel mailing list > Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tinycc-devel mailing list > Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel