Switch to vlang ? "C standards committee", let me chuckle a bit. Have you seen what they call "standards" ? Bitfield ordering anyone ?
Yeah, C is becoming quite a dumpster of "ideas" and "features", a programming language "freak" of many "extensions". What's rather strange is the constant need to keep C "relevant" while maintaining historical "quirks" for "compatibility". I thought that Python would avoid the same fate, but it has become quite a mess too, despite the version 3 "sanitation". I think if you want a relatively "stable" yet recent/decent "low level" programming language might be rust, I guess. Yet it is nowhere close to the size and speed of TCC, hence I proposed to take the vlang route, even though it is alpha. Regards. ----- Mail d'origine ----- De: Charles Lohr <[email protected]> À: [email protected] Envoyé: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 19:55:00 +0100 (CET) Objet: [Tinycc-devel] Is anyone on the C standards committee? I was just wondering if anyone from TCC on the standards committee? I just really hope for a compiler as popular as TCC, there's someone there defending the interests of all the not-GCC, not-clang compilers, where difficulty of feature addition is a paramount concern. I use TCC as my daily driver, and I have been increasingly anxious about some of the proposals and things that are being added to the C standard. Charles _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
