Sorry, I inadvertently replied to this thread instead of the main thread. I will move my reply there.
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 2:53 PM Charles Lohr <loh...@gmail.com> wrote: > My suggestion is if possible someone from our group/view should try to > apply whatever means we can to keep C clean, clear and simple to implement > the standard, allowing the people who feel the drive to "improve things" to > direct that at a different language standard, or an offshoot of some sort. > I think a lot of the folks need to play chesterton's fence, until only the > most crucial changes percolate up. > > I feel it is important to the commercial space that the C standard remains > more carefully preserved. > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 1:26 PM Steffen Nurpmeso <stef...@sdaoden.eu> > wrote: > >> david.k...@libertysurf.fr wrote in >> <1115648581.65680975.1674678973317.javamail.r...@zimbra30-e5.priv.proxad >> \ >> .net>: >> ... >> |I think if you want a relatively "stable" yet recent/decent "low level" >> \ >> |programming language might be rust, I guess. >> >> Nim. (If you really want GC and other such things out of >> control.) >> >> --steffen >> | >> |Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear, >> |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one >> |einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off >> |(By Robert Gernhardt) >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tinycc-devel mailing list >> Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org >> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel >> >
_______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
