My suggestion is if possible someone from our group/view should try to apply whatever means we can to keep C clean, clear and simple to implement the standard, allowing the people who feel the drive to "improve things" to direct that at a different language standard, or an offshoot of some sort. I think a lot of the folks need to play chesterton's fence, until only the most crucial changes percolate up.
I feel it is important to the commercial space that the C standard remains more carefully preserved. On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 1:26 PM Steffen Nurpmeso <stef...@sdaoden.eu> wrote: > david.k...@libertysurf.fr wrote in > <1115648581.65680975.1674678973317.javamail.r...@zimbra30-e5.priv.proxad\ > .net>: > ... > |I think if you want a relatively "stable" yet recent/decent "low level" \ > |programming language might be rust, I guess. > > Nim. (If you really want GC and other such things out of > control.) > > --steffen > | > |Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear, > |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one > |einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off > |(By Robert Gernhardt) > > _______________________________________________ > Tinycc-devel mailing list > Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel >
_______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
