Ekaitz Zarraga <eka...@elenq.tech> wrote: > ``` > ld rd, rs, offset > ``` > > It even had the input registers inverted in the store instruction. I > converted it to:
I don't see what is wrong with this, ld rd, rs, offset closely follows the layout of the encoding: I-Type: imm[11:0] | rs1 | funct3 | rd | opcode yes, it's antisymmetric, but I think the other way around (offset, rs, rd ld) is even more inconvenient. > > ``` > ld rd, offset(rs) > ``` > > As it should be. I'd simply consider this a pseudoinstruction. > all the structure of the assembler is designed for the old (and > non-standard) syntax. It needs more work. Can you point me to the standard on RISC-V assembly syntax? I could find ratified specs for instructions, not asm syntax. Thanks. _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
