Just for my 2-cents,
I agree with Ekaitz, the tcc assembler syntax should follow what everyone
else does so that the assembly code doesn't need to be rewritten.
For a while I was trying to add riscv32 support to tcc and hit a bunch of
assembly test software that broke with the current formatting.

> I've seen it before, doesn't say anywhere that it's ratified, and the
scope mentions that it's a guide for writing assembly, not an assembler.

Since it is the guide that most people will look to to write riscv
assembly, I think we should try and match it as much as possible.

Thanks,
-Sam
Soli Deo Gloria
_______________________________________________
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel

Reply via email to