@gegard > From what I understand of Fabien's description, certification is one way to > provide it. Or you personally can guarantee the migration if that's what your > customers want.
That is the question, because in one post he states that QC at least guarantees painless migration, on the other he states that there is no guarantee at all. > He's obviously not saying that. This is the conclusion from the posts, real situation with release practice and Tiny's marketing affairs. It is the way other ERP systems have gone many times before. This is why many open source ERP like systems have so many clone/fork systems, because main project upon getting stable demand level, starts to become proprietary at least partially. Leaving only the core modules available to the general public. Kaspars ------------------- http://kndati.lv -------------------- m2f -------------------- -- http://www.openobject.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=42388#42388 -------------------- m2f -------------------- _______________________________________________ Tinyerp-users mailing list http://tiny.be/mailman2/listinfo/tinyerp-users
