On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Razvan Musaloiu-E. <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi! > > On Wed, 14 Jan 2009, Miklos Maroti wrote: > >> Channel 11 is not too bad either, no? Miklos > > Zigbee channel 11 is overlapping with the WiFi channel 1. That is no true > for Zigbee channel 26. As you can see from figure 4 from the paper the > lossrate of the 4 Zigbee channel overlapping a WiFi channel will have losses > if the WiFi traffic is increased. As figure 1 indicate, Zigbee channel 24 is > the last one overlapping with the WiFi channel 11. So both 25 and 26 should > be the best one, with 26 being the farthest away.
Well, maybe the RF230 has some problems with channel 26, so channel 25 could be much better. Anyways, if there are observable real world problems with channel 26 on the IRIS then no academic reasoning is going to change that!! We need to have a default where the mote is working at its peek. If people want interoperability, they are fine to experiment with other channels. So my question, can someone run real application experiments on channel 11, 25, and 26? Loss rate would be interesting to know. (I have no motes) Miklos _______________________________________________ Tinyos-help mailing list [email protected] https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help
