Hi! On Wed, 14 Jan 2009, Miklos Maroti wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Razvan Musaloiu-E. <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Hi! >> >> On Wed, 14 Jan 2009, Miklos Maroti wrote: >> >>> Channel 11 is not too bad either, no? Miklos >> >> Zigbee channel 11 is overlapping with the WiFi channel 1. That is no true >> for Zigbee channel 26. As you can see from figure 4 from the paper the >> lossrate of the 4 Zigbee channel overlapping a WiFi channel will have losses >> if the WiFi traffic is increased. As figure 1 indicate, Zigbee channel 24 is >> the last one overlapping with the WiFi channel 11. So both 25 and 26 should >> be the best one, with 26 being the farthest away. > > Well, maybe the RF230 has some problems with channel 26, so channel 25 > could be much better. Anyways, if there are observable real world > problems with channel 26 on the IRIS then no academic reasoning is > going to change that!! I agree. But I want to be able to replicate these problems with channel 26 on our side. > We need to have a default where the mote is > working at its peek. If people want interoperability, they are fine to > experiment with other channels. > > So my question, can someone run real application experiments on > channel 11, 25, and 26? Loss rate would be interesting to know. (I > have no motes) It will take some time but we'll run some tests and measure the loss rate on Zigbee channel 11 with heavy WiFi traffic on WiFi channel 1 and the loss rate on channels 25 and 26 with heavy WiFi traffic on WiFi channel 11. :-) -- Razvan ME _______________________________________________ Tinyos-help mailing list [email protected] https://www.millennium.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tinyos-help
