Hi Rob:

It is at our school. It is just a matter of operating procedures and not a 
matter of trust. I don't think anyone mistrusts you but it is the 'safe' way to 
do things--not all researchers might be as trustworthy as you are and CYA, in 
our litiginous society, is always a good code.

Sounds like you are doing everything else by SOP, I'm thrilled to see undergrad 
education students being taught the IRB ropes! We have a doctoral program in 
education at our school and you would be surprised how inexperienced most of 
the candidates are with procedures.

I would not be hard on your IRB. They are probably a nice bunch of folks who 
give of their time and expertise freely and have only good intentions at 
heart :-)

Annette

Quoting Rob Weisskirch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> TIPSfolk,
> 
> I have an IRB question.  I have several students in a senior capstone
> course who are planning to conduct innocuous interviews or surveys with
> students in local public schools.  All the students have prepared the
> appropriate consents and assents as required by Human Subjects.  The
> school districts or schools do not have IRBs.  These are not Psych
> students but are Liberal Studies students (pre-Teacher Education).  They
> are making their research "public" by doing presentations in a public
> senior capstone festival.
> 
> However, in the Human Subjects application, when I conduct research, I
> usually write that I will obtain written consent from the principal and if
> he/she says that district approval is necessary, I will get that first
> (and have told students to do the same).  Now, the IRB is saying that
> students have to submit the written approval from the principal with the
> Human Subjects application.  As the faculty co-sponsor, this seems quite
> distrustful that I won't do my job to verify that the written consent is
> obtained (Yes, I know students sometimes are eager and neglect this
> step!).  Also, doesn't that create a situation where a principal might say
> yes to a project and the IRB requests substantial revision, requiring the
> student to alter the approach significantly.  I can't find anything that
> specifically states that this has to be done prior to review.
> 
> So, I guess the bottom line is:  Procedurally, is it required to get
> off-site approval prior to the IRB review? 
> 
> Thanks,
> Rob
> Rob Weisskirch, MSW, Ph.D.
> Human Development Program
> Department of Liberal Studies, Building 15
> 100 Campus Center
> California State University, Monterey Bay
> Seaside, CA 93955-8001
> (831) 582-5079
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


Annette Kujawski Taylor, Ph. D.
Department of Psychology
University of San Diego 
5998 Alcala Park
San Diego, CA 92110
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to