Now that we are all congratulating ourselves on figuring out stroboscopic motion with steady illumination, let me throw a monkey wrench into the discussion. Could it be the result of torsional nystagmus, which is (I think) rotation around the line of sight? There is abnormal torsional nystagmus (and a Google search turned up tons of stuff), but it runs in my mind that there is a normal torsional nystagmus that would tend to keep a rotating object (such as a wheel) stable on the retina (analogous to vestibular nystagmus in the horizontal plane). don
Donald McBurney
As usual, I don't have time to research this, but maybe Stephen does. ;-)


Ken Steele wrote:

Tom: Congratulations!

Tom Allaway wrote:

To all, but especially Stephen, Doug and David:

    I do believe I've got it!  The demonstration experiment involved, in
my case, a small kitchen device similar to a salad spinner, containing a
rotating perforated plastic tub.  When spun under a flourescent light,
it showed a clear "wagon wheel effect" (i.e., the temporary appearance
and reverse rotation of the perforations during deceleration).  I took
it outside, and there was no effect to be observed.  The crucial test:
with my only source being daylight, I applied to my skull a vibratory
stimulus, in the form of the business end of an electric toothbrush
(minus the brush part) pressed against my chin.  Violets!  There was the
wagon wheel effect!
Q.E.D.

Let's hear it for empiricism.





--- You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to