My exams are part objective and part subjective. Returning exams, to me, is a 
part of teaching. Sort of loosely based on the concept that we learn from our 
mistakes. However, I minimize the class time and use a lot of one on one 
time--I can do this because we top our class enrollments at 40 and not all 
that many students take advantage of my one on one offer.

Many years ago I stopped going over the objective part and tell students to 
come see me on a one to one basis to discuss what they missed. Usually they 
just have a scantron with red marks so only the ones who really care want to 
see what they missed.

This accomplishes many things for me: no more arguing with one person in front 
of an entire class about 2 points and then 10 other people conveniently 
jumping on the "me too" bandwagon. It lead to difficult exchanges in the 
classroom and wasted a lot of class time.

When they come to see me one on one I print out for them all of the items they 
missed and give a make-up assignment: they must write me two sentences per 
item: one sentence tells me why they think they picked the wrong answer: 
anything from "I didn't read all the options before selecting one," to "I just 
guessed," to "I have differing information in my class notes and from the text 
and here is the chapter and verse for each." I believe that overall, this 
first sentence helps students to see if there is a pattern to their errors--
espeically for those who miss many of the objective items.

A second sentence tells me what about their answer is incorrect and what about 
the "correct" answer makes it "best". This is done to ensure that they now 
understand the concepts. 

I give them half credit for this, a procedure that has never leapfrogged 
anyone into some massively better grade--typically the people who missed many 
items received a D or F on the exam and might bring their grade up to a C+ at 
best. I think that this at least provides the students with an opportunity to 
finally learn what they missed learning the first time. I allow this for all 
students, even those who had an A on the exam since my grading system works on 
an accumulation of points. it does lead to some 'grade inflation' but I feel 
strongly at this point in my teaching career that I am more interested in 
knowing that they actually know and understand something eventually....

Oh yes, I do read these carefully and typically most students do NOT get back 
all of the points they attempt to receive on the make-up.

As for the subjective items, I always have a rubric and we go over that rubric 
in class, when I give the items back. Again, if a particular student feels 
that they don't understand why they lost points then they have to come see me 
because it takes up too much time and is boring for the rest of the class for 
me to try to recreate in my mind what I was thinking was lacking in how a 
particular student expressed their answer to a particular item. 

Often times I have alternate items from past exams and these again can be 
attempted for half credit of what they missed orignally at the make-up; but 
these are also read closely and graded more stringently and students 
understand that. So typically, if an essay was worth 20 points and the student 
earned 10 points originally, they can chose to write a whole new essay for 5 
additional points (half of the 10 points I took off originally). They usually 
average about 3 or 4 points.

Still, I feel that they learn more, I don't waste too much class time and 
those who don't care don't come see me--only those who care about learning or 
who care about their grades--but no matter, either way they are learning!

And my life is less stressed with returning exams with this format.

Annette



Quoting DeVolder Carol L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Sorry for the cross-posting, I meant to post this only to TIPS but wasn't
> paying attention when I put in the address.
> 
> Hi TIPSpeople,
> How many of you take class time to go over exams after they are corrected?
> Whether you do or don't, what is your rationale?
> Thanks, I appreciate your responses.
> Carol
> 
> 
> Carol DeVolder, Ph.D.
> Associate Professor of Psychology
> St. Ambrose University
> Davenport, Iowa  52803
> 
> phone: 563-333-6482
> e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


Annette Kujawski Taylor, Ph. D.
Department of Psychology
University of San Diego 
5998 Alcala Park
San Diego, CA 92110
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to