At 1:53 PM -0500 1/20/06, Christopher D. Green wrote:
michael sylvester wrote:
remember when I posted the thread "Is learning unnatural?"
The current article would tend to support my view that the
Eurocentric model is not necessary for human survival.I am sure
that those students will be able to carve out a living for
themselves. Viva multiple intelligences.
Yes, well, Michael, I'm hoping for a little more for my student than
being able to "carve out a living for themselves." Medieval stone
masons carved out a living for themselves (literally!) but I like to
think I offer my students a little more than that. Pretentious me!
And there's a lot of carving going on in Africa right now, but I'm
not sure that living is the result.
--
The best argument against Intelligent Design is that fact that
people believe in it.
* PAUL K. BRANDON [EMAIL PROTECTED] *
* Psychology Dept Minnesota State University *
* 23 Armstrong Hall, Mankato, MN 56001 ph 507-389-6217 *
* http://www.mnsu.edu/dept/psych/welcome.html *
---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
