I am interested in knowing why Jim felt the need to include the phrase in bold in the sentence below. To what extent is that not possible?
Dr. Rick Froman Associate Professor of Psychology John Brown University 2000 W. University Siloam Springs, AR 72761 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (479) 524-7295 http://www.jbu.edu/academics/sbs/faculty/rfroman.asp Rick -----Original Message----- From: Jim Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 4:07 PM To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS) Subject: [tips] Re: It's what they believe Hi James M. Clark When we teach students to think critically, to use science and reason to arrive at conclusions about the world, do we (or should we) be teaching them that there are certain domains (e.g., religion, morals, tradition, ...) to which these principles ought not to be applied? The answer would appear to be "yes" by people who adhere to something like Gould's separate magisteria or by people who say that science is irrelevant to questions about the existence of god and the like. The answer is "no" by definition to those of us who maintain that science and reason should be core to all our beliefs (and ideally our behaviors), to the extent that is possible. --- To make changes to your subscription go to: http://acsun.frostburg.edu/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=tips&text_mode=0&lang=english
