With regard to the note on extinction.
With 121 posts since the last time I logged on, I must admit I didn't read a
lot of them. But somehwere in the feeding frenzy thread about M. Sylvester
someone mentioned using extinction rather than punishment because it has been
shown to be more effective.
Would it be fair to say that extinction is more effective than punishment
because we can't ethically use punishment optimally? That is, immediate and as
severe as possible?
--Mike
---
To make changes to your subscription contact:
Bill Southerly ([email protected])
