A student in my intro to psych class asked me this question, which I think 
would have an answer someplace in social psych:

He works at SeaWorld, a large amusement park. He prefaced his question by 
telling me that he fully understands that when people go to these places they 
are not 'themselves' but rather some zombie-like shell of themselves--they 
don't seem to show much thinking going on but rather turn off for the day. Now 
this relates to the question because it is more like automatic processing than 
thoughtful behavior that he is interested in.

His job is outside a very large "show" that requires special glasses (like 3D 
but not 3D). His job is to take a HUGE pile of these glasses as people deposit 
them into a barrel, exiting the previous show, and to disentangle the pile and 
lay them out neatly on a table so that people going into the show can just grab 
a pair and go on in. The table is a half round and the glasses are laid out in 
a semi-circle, about 3 deep, and then his tangled pile sits near the back, 
center. As a person takes a pair of glasses his job is to disentangle a pair 
and place it out on the perimeter for easy access. He emphasized that this is a 
VERY large table, so that his tangled pile is quite far away. He said that a 
person has to be at least 5'10" tall to reach over to his pile. But if you are 
anticipating, well yes, he claims that about 50% of the people would rather 
reach into the tangled pile to grab glasses, rather than take the nicely laid 
out, easy access, disentangled and neatly folded and placed glasses along the 
edge of the table.

He is just fascinated by this phenomenon but doesn't know where to begin to 
explain it or even how to study it. Kudos to him for being curious. He says he 
could study it if he could think of a task for it. His employers are pretty 
flexible about things like that.

Any ideas on this list on what is going on? Any ideas on how to test the 
hypothesis that that is indeed what is going on? For example, he could make the 
tangled pile easier to access and the neatly folded glasses less accessible. 
But what hypothesis would that be testing? Frankly, I am also at a loss. I'm 
not surprised that people do something more difficult than the easy thing, but 
again, I have no way to explain it.

I look forward to some help. Please don't make me go to that other list....

Annette


Annette Kujawski Taylor, Ph. D.
Professor, Psychological Sciences
University of San Diego
5998 Alcala Park
San Diego, CA 92110
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>


---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=5526
or send a blank email to 
leave-5526-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to