I think Jim's post highlights some of the problems when talking about "objective", "evidence", "opinion", etc.
That is, the reviewer Jan Golinski is simply promoting further "evidence" for his views while Jim sees through this with his more "objective" knowledge which presumably puts the lie to Golinski. (Yes I know I'm interpreting a bit here, but if I try to avoid doing so, I would be in danger of writing an essay :)) What recent crankiness on TIPS? Is that an Objective assessment? A Neutral assessment? An opinion? or an Agenda? Justify your view using at least 46 references. Please include a full history and critical analysis of epistemology. You should include a particular emphasis on Kant's the Critique of Pure Reason. The response should be exhaustive and complete with a discussion section which delineates the role of this analysis in evidence based living or its lack thereof. Be brief. --Mike --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected]. To unsubscribe click here: http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=6761 or send a blank email to leave-6761-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
