I think Jim's post highlights some of the problems when talking about
"objective", "evidence", "opinion", etc.

That is, the reviewer Jan Golinski is simply promoting further
"evidence" for his views while Jim sees through this
with his more "objective" knowledge which presumably puts the lie to Golinski.
(Yes I know I'm interpreting a bit here, but if I try to avoid doing
so, I would be in danger of writing an essay :))

What recent crankiness on TIPS?
Is that an Objective assessment? A Neutral assessment? An opinion? or an Agenda?
Justify your view using at least 46 references. Please include a full
history and critical analysis of epistemology.
You should include a particular emphasis on Kant's the Critique of Pure Reason.
The response should be exhaustive and complete with a discussion
section which delineates the role of this analysis
in evidence based living or its lack thereof. Be brief.

--Mike

---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=6761
or send a blank email to 
leave-6761-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to