Michael Smith wrote: > I think Jim's post highlights some of the problems when talking about > "objective", "evidence", "opinion", etc. > > That is, the reviewer Jan Golinski is simply promoting further > "evidence" for his views while Jim sees through this > with his more "objective" knowledge which presumably puts the lie to Golinski. >
Jim saw nothing because he has not read the book. He merely *presumed* because he didnn't like what he thought he might see if he looked. Now *that's* cranky (not to mention subjective). Chris -- Christopher D. Green Department of Psychology York University Toronto, ON M3J 1P3 Canada 416-736-2100 ex. 66164 [email protected] http://www.yorku.ca/christo/ ========================== --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected]. To unsubscribe click here: http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=6762 or send a blank email to leave-6762-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
