On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:58:43 -0800, Patricia Santoro wrote:
>Hello All,
>
>A friend of mine has a job interview next week at a large University where a 
>teaching demo to a class of 300 is required. If you have any suggestion on how 
>to engage a large class who do not know you, and will not see you again, 
>please 
>share, and I will pass them on. Most of my ideas take time to work through 
>with 
>a class, and would be hard to accomplish in just one meeting.

A number of years ago the memory researcher Daniel Schacter was making 
an invited address at, I think, an Eastern Psychological Association meeting 
and he started off by using a version of what is now known as the 
Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) procedure.  That is, Schacter read a list
of words and then asked the audience (a large room that was packed with
people) to raise their hand to indicate whether a word that he would now
say was part of the earlier list.  Of course, when he said the non-presented
target word over a half of the audience raise their hands, thus providing
an immediate and clear example of how false memories can be produced.
One can then take this into a traditional memory research areas such the 
fragility of memory, the unreliability of eyewitness testimony, etc., or in 
the direction of recovered memories and the problem of how to deal
with a person's memory for an event that has no external evidence for
(e.g., child sacrifice at satanic ceremonies).  For a more clinically
oriented presentation, one can focus on how one feels about the memory
regardless of whether it is true or not, how not to have it influence
one's current thinking and behavior through reframing the memory
and developing skills in dealing witht he memory, etc.

There is a brief entry on the DRM procedure on Wikipedia which
does provide a couple of the relevant references; see:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deese%E2%80%93Roediger%E2%80%93McDermott_paradigm
I can't vouch whether this will work or not but the original article
by Roediger & McDermott (1995) might be accessible here:
http://step.psy.cmu.edu/articles/Roediger95.htm
A later paper by Stadler, Roediger & McDermott (1999) provides 
norms for lists and target words (published in Memory & Cognition)
and which might be accessible at this link:
http://step.psy.cmu.edu/articles/Roediger95.htm

-Mike Palij
New York University
[email protected]






---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=8925
or send a blank email to 
leave-8925-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to