Scott--
I think that Mike Williams' point is (at least it should be) that we should 
assume that a treatment is not effective until it has been proven to be 
effective.  In the case of psychiatric treatment, this is a high hurdle because 
of the difficulty of carrying out a double blind (or even single blind) 
experimental design.

On Sep 20, 2011, at 6:20 AM, Lilienfeld, Scott O wrote:

> Mike Williams wrote that "The other medications, including all the 
> antidepressants, have no
> treatment effect."  Mike later says, when describing the effecs of such 
> medicatiions, that "there is nothing there."
> 
>    Mike, I had thought your very point was because most studies of 
> antidepressants aren't conducted in a strictly double-blind fashion (because 
> of medication side effects...although you didn't address active placebo 
> studies), we cannot draw clear-cut conclusions from them.
> 
>    But Mike, you are now saying that we can conclude with confidence that 
> antidepressants have no treatment effect.  One can't have things both ways - 
> if the studies are categorically "invalid" (not merely imperfect) as you 
> asserted in previous messages, then one can't draw conclusions from them one 
> way or the other.  Mike, I don't follow your logic here.
> 
>      Mike, you also never responded to my points or Jim Clark's questions 
> regarding your earlier claims that "all" of the dependent measures in 
> antidepressant studies come from either clients or therapists themselves.  
> When I pointed out (with references to meta-analyses) that this assertion was 
> false, you merely continued to reiterate your previous points without 
> acknowledgng our criticisms.
> 
>    I have to confess that I'm finding this TIPS discussion regarding 
> antidepressant and therapeutic efficacy increasingly troubling.  It seems to 
> be more of a discussion of ideology than science.  It also seems to be marked 
> by the kind of dichotomous, categorical claims (e.g., studies of therapeutic 
> efficacy are "invalid", antidepressants "have no treatment effect," "there is 
> nothing there," "ECT is pure behavior therapy," "ECT is a punishment 
> condition," "the Beck Depression Inventory..is not a measure of mood") that 
> we would rightly criticize in our students.
> 
>     Again, I am somewhat skeptical of many claims of strong antidepressant 
> efficacy myself, so have no particular agenda in this debate.  But shouldn't 
> we be refraining from drawing extremely strong conclusions from large, 
> extreme complex bodies of literature that we all agree are challenging to 
> interpret given various methodological limitations?
> 
>      I also worry that this discussion is mixing up epistemic with 
> ontological assertions. It's one thing to say "I think that studies of 
> antidepressant medication are inconclusive because of methodological flaws 
> (and that many people have overstated the strength of evidence for their 
> efficacy)" but another to say "It's clear that antidepressant medications 
> don't work." One is an assertion about the evidence for claim X, the other is 
> an assertion about the verimissilude of claim X.  These are two entirely 
> different assertions, and Mike wants to be able to make both of them.  I 
> don't think he can.
> 
> ....Scott
> ________________________________________
> From: Mike Wiliams [[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 2:47 AM
> To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
> Subject: [tips] CHRONICLE: Are Psychiatric Medications Making Us Sicker?
> 
> Reading this article brought back many memories and disillusionment with
> clinical trials.  However, I believe there are opportunities to
> study what a placebo is, and how this condition influences our dependent
> measures.
> 
> The only psychotropic medications that work are those that sedate
> patients who are anxious, manic, or actively psychotic.  They
> actually help people because they chemically suppress the worst
> symptoms.  They don't cure people and they are associated with
> so many adverse side effects that no one can take them day in and day
> out without becoming a zombie.
> 
> The other medications, including all the antidepressants, have no
> treatment effect.  The effects represents the manipulation of the
> patients to endorse positive changes on the dependents measures.  As a
> result of the expectation biases I described before, the
> patients endorse change on the measures but their mood stays the same.
> Anyone who describes placebo as a treatment effect is
> just trying to extract something positive from ingesting these chemicals
> when there is nothing there.
> 
> The positive change endorsed by the subjects is not a positive change.
> The validity of the depression measures have been
> compromised by the expectation bias.  The Beck Depression Scale is now a
> measure of expectation bias and
> not a measure of mood.
> 
> ECT is pure behavior therapy: "Mr. Smith, we understand that you are
> unhappy.  We will continue to induce seizures until you feel better."
> After a few seizures, Mr. Smith endorses positive change on the Beck
> Depression Inventory.  The psychiatrist stops inducing seizures.
> 
> ECT is a punishment condition.
> 
> Just to belabor the point: There are no double blinded studies of
> psychotropic meds and any psychotherapy interventions.  Given
> this situation, we are currently ruminating about the significance of
> noise.
> 
> Mike Williams
> 
> Are Psychiatric Medications Making Us Sicker?
> By John Horgan
> Several generations of psychotropic drugs have proven to be of little or no 
> benefit, and may be doing considerable harm.
> http://chronicle.com/article/Are-Psychiatric-Medications/128976/
> 
> 
> 
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
> To unsubscribe click here: 
> http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13509.d0999cebc8f4ed4eb54d5317367e9b2f&n=T&l=tips&o=12790
> or send a blank email to 
> leave-12790-13509.d0999cebc8f4ed4eb54d5317367e9...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of
> the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
> information. If the reader of this message is not the intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
> or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly
> prohibited.
> 
> If you have received this message in error, please contact
> the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the
> original message (including attachments).
> 
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
> To unsubscribe click here: 
> http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13438.3b5166ef147b143fedd04b1c4a64900b&n=T&l=tips&o=12793
> or send a blank email to 
> leave-12793-13438.3b5166ef147b143fedd04b1c4a649...@fsulist.frostburg.edu


---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=12810
or send a blank email to 
leave-12810-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to