My recollection of the use of the word 'naive' is usually in a phrase, such as 
'naive subjects' or perhaps 'naive rats' and was usually used in connection 
with conditioning studies of the 1970s and earlier to describe animals that had 
not been previously used in behavioral experiments. When used in the context of 
human subjects research, my sense is that the term is usually used in a manner 
consistent with Allen's post and it is typically expressed as something like 
'naive as to the purpose of the experiment' or 'naive as to experimental 
hypothesis'. Actually, when reviewing certain studies with small 'n', I usually 
look for this expression because I suspect that the expected assumption of 
subjects' naivete as to the nature of the hypothesis/study may not be met. 


Miguel 

----- Original Message -----
From: "Allen Esterson" <[email protected]> 
To: "Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)" 
<[email protected]> 
Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2013 4:33:18 AM 
Subject: Re:[tips] tips digest: June 28, 2013 







In the context of an Oxford University psychology team's research report Rick 
Froman wondered if the term " naïve participant" was specifically British 
usage. A Google search shows it occurs in A Dictionary of Psychology , Oxford 
University Press, 2008 and in The SAGE Handbook of Social Psychology: Concise 
Student Edition in line with what Rick suggested, namely, a participant who is 
unaware of the purpose of the research or the hypothesis being tested. But it 
also comes up in American publications, so it is not exclusively British usage: 
http://digitalcommons.wku.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1320&context=ijes 


Allen Esterson 
Former lecturer, Science Department 
Southwark College, London 
[email protected] 
http://www.esterson.org 


-----Original Message----- 

From: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS) digest 
<[email protected]> 
To: tips digest recipients <[email protected]> 
Sent: Sat, Jun 29, 2013 6:30 am 
Subject: tips digest: June 28, 2013 


Subject: tips digest: June 28, 2013
From: "Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS) digest" 
< [email protected] >
Reply-To: "Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)" < 
[email protected] >
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2013 01:00:01 -0400

TIPS Digest for Friday, June 28, 2013.

1. A flavorful research article

---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected] To 
unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13076.897dfc4f20f0edf00528e4c6f4ad2c5b&n=T&l=tips&o=26272
 or send a blank email to 
leave-26272-13076.897dfc4f20f0edf00528e4c6f4ad2...@fsulist.frostburg.edu 


Attached Message        From:   [email protected] <[email protected]> 
        Subject:        A flavorful research article 
        Date:   Fri, 28 Jun 2013 10:50:30 -0500 



While reading a research report on the topic of the effect of cutlery on taste 
in the open access journal Flavour , I noted this sentence: “Forty naïve Oxford 
University undergraduate students participated 
in Experiment 2…”. After wondering if that wasn’t a redundancy (or if this 
description would apply to a majority or only a minority of Oxford students), I 
wondered what the word “naïve” might mean in this usage. It was used as if it 
were familiar jargon to describe an element of the design. Is this a common 
British term to mean “blinded to the experimental design or hypothesis”? 

My next favorite line from the article was, “all of the participants were 
British, that is, native English speakers, save one participant who was 
bilingual”. I would have thought such as assumption to be more likely made of 
American than British university students (imagine the humor if the sentence 
had read, “all of the participants were American, that is, native English 
speakers”). Maybe they weren’t really referring to how many languages of 
fluency but just that their first language was English. 

It was also interesting that the Methodology section came after the Results and 
Conclusions. 

If you couldn’t access the hyperlink above, the URL of the article is: 
http://www.flavourjournal.com/content/pdf/2044-7248-2-21.pdf . 

Rick 

Dr. Rick Froman, Chair 
Division of Humanities and Social Sciences 
Professor of Psychology 
Box 3519 
John Brown University 
2000 W. University Siloam Springs, AR 72761 
[email protected] 
(479) 524-7295 
http://bit.ly/DrFroman 


--- 

You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected] . 

To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=466839.0421d1005414eed82340aa280e7ce629&n=T&l=tips&o=26276
 

(It may be necessary to cut and paste the above URL if the line is broken) 

or send a blank email to 
leave-26276-466839.0421d1005414eed82340aa280e7ce...@fsulist.frostburg.edu 




---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=26277
or send a blank email to 
leave-26277-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to