On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 2:23 AM Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 > > RFC9847 says: > > Setting a value to "Y" or "D" or transitioning the value from "Y" or > "D" in the "Recommended" column requires IETF Standards Action with > Expert Review or IESG Approval [RFC8126]. > > Is the intention to go through an IETF-wide last call to make a new IETF > Standards Action? > > It isn't clear to me if that sentence is supposed to be interpreted as: > > Setting a value to "Y" or "D" or transitioning the value from "Y" or > "D" in the "Recommended" column requires (IETF Standards Action with > Expert Review) or (IESG Approval [RFC8126]) > > or > > Setting a value to "Y" or "D" or transitioning the value from "Y" or > "D" in the "Recommended" column requires IETF Standards Action with > ((Expert Review) or (IESG Approval [RFC8126])) > > [Joe] The first interpretation is what we intended. The document is already on the standards track. I'm not sure that IETF last call will be necessary, but we will work with our AD to determine the right path forward. > /Simon > > Joseph Salowey <[email protected]> writes: > > > The chairs believe there is emerging consensus that X25519MLKEM768 should > > be promoted to 'Recommended' status and that the best path is to update > > draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-mlkem. This is a working group last call to update > the > > status of X25519MLKEM768 to "Recommended: Y" in > draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-mlkem. > > This change would update the IANA considerations in Section 7.1 as > follows: > > > > OLD: > > > > Value: 4588 (0x11EC) > > Description: X25519MLKEM768 > > DTLS-OK: Y > > Recommended: N > > Reference: This document > > Comment: Combining X25519 ECDH with ML-KEM-768 > > > > NEW: > > > > Value: 4588 (0x11EC) > > Description: X25519MLKEM768 > > DTLS-OK: Y > > Recommended: Y > > Reference: This document > > Comment: Combining X25519 ECDH with ML-KEM-768 > > > > Please respond to this thread to indicate whether you agree or disagree > > with this change. If you disagree, please provide your reasoning. > > > > This last call will end on May 25, 2026. > > > > REMINDER: If you have not done so recently, review the TLS WG's Mail List > > Procedures; see [1]. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Joe, Sean, And Deirdre > > > > [1] > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/EY5HtVwqsgVZxrFSPrc7x8zO-9g/ > > _______________________________________________ > > TLS mailing list -- [email protected] > > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > > >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
