Hello I support this change. It sounds reasonable.
On 12 May 2026 03:36:38 BST, Joseph Salowey <[email protected]> wrote: >The chairs believe there is emerging consensus that X25519MLKEM768 should >be promoted to 'Recommended' status and that the best path is to update >draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-mlkem. This is a working group last call to update the >status of X25519MLKEM768 to "Recommended: Y" in draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-mlkem. >This change would update the IANA considerations in Section 7.1 as follows: > >OLD: > > Value: 4588 (0x11EC) > Description: X25519MLKEM768 > DTLS-OK: Y > Recommended: N > Reference: This document > Comment: Combining X25519 ECDH with ML-KEM-768 > >NEW: > > Value: 4588 (0x11EC) > Description: X25519MLKEM768 > DTLS-OK: Y > Recommended: Y > Reference: This document > Comment: Combining X25519 ECDH with ML-KEM-768 > >Please respond to this thread to indicate whether you agree or disagree >with this change. If you disagree, please provide your reasoning. > >This last call will end on May 25, 2026. > >REMINDER: If you have not done so recently, review the TLS WG's Mail List >Procedures; see [1]. > >Thanks, > >Joe, Sean, And Deirdre > >[1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/EY5HtVwqsgVZxrFSPrc7x8zO-9g/
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
