> From: "Jason R. Mastaler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 15:27:20 -0700 > > FWIW, I've never used a 'sender' or 'keyword' address. > > The 'sender' address was inherited from the TMS script that TMDA got > some inital ideas from. In some special circumstances, I could see > their utility, but I've never needed them in practice.
I started out as a TMS user and used some 'sender' addresses early on, but I quickly found that they caused more problems than they were worth, so I switched them all to 'ext' addresses. > 'keyword' addresses were implemented for systems (like Sendmail) which > don't allow the user to control mail to extension addresses, or where > the user prefers to control everything through his TMDA > configuration. I personally use qmail's powerful dot-qmail interface > instead. I've never used 'keyword' addresses either for the same reasons. > 'dated' addresses are the standout IMO, as they elegantly solve a > whole slew of problems that traditional challenge/response systems > cannot. yeah. 'dated' and 'ext' addresses cover most everything for me (although since I have a reason for using 2 domains, I also have 'as' addresses to map into my other domain). Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ virCIO http://www.virCIO.Com 716 Congress, Suite 200 Austin, TX 78701 +1 512 374 0500 Without some consensus on what *should* happen, all that remains is a desert of unfufilled expectations cross dressing as "bugs". --- Jeff Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
