This is such a tiring argument. Call me arrogant, but if someone expects me to wade through a couple hundred spam emails a day for the ability to correspond with them, while not inconveniencing them, then I'm sure that I really don't want to correspond with them. And if for some reason, I find myself really, really, wanting to correspond with them anyway... then I will just use a telephone. I'm not going to sacrifice the usability of my email for idiots that expect me to bend over backwards for their convenience (hey, no one quit sending HTML emails to me when I asked). TMDA has rescued two of my email addresses that I'd practically given up on because of the amount of spam I was receiving. One has been active for 11 years and the other 10. If it weren't for TMDA, I wouldn't even be able to give out these email addresses for people to use to correspond with me.
Yes, I'm one of those people who don't even look in my pending directory. Is your "friend" a spammer by any chance?? :) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matthew Parke Bostrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 12:57 AM Subject: Re: Constraining Bogus challenges. > Hmmmm. I've corresponded with someone who finds basic C/Rs > "extremely" annoying (his word, not mine). He refuses to respond to > them on principle. He claims he is not alone. He would probably find > a more elaborate response requirement even more annoying. > > I'm not saying he's right, just that he exists, and I, or you, > might someday want to exchange email with him. _____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
