On Monday 22 September 2003 04:35 pm, Karsten M. Self wrote: > As I have: > > http://kmself.home.netcom.com/Rants/challenge-response.html
Remember that quote about, "lies, danm lies and statistics'? I checked that URL. You throw in a smattering of statistics and pseudo-statistics and then make a whole boatload of assumptions. You want quantified data? Try this: We have been using TMDA since version 0.33. Percent of challenges to forged email addresses: 0.00 Percent of challenges to joe-job victims: 0.00 Percent of challenges to someone other than the initial sender: 0.00 Now there is one thing you should ad to your web page. You should include information that you have no skills as a sysadmin. You might also want to add the assumption that you never will have. Want more statistics? Every time I defend C/R on lists like spam-l or spamcop, we get a 48.6% increase in the level of mail that appears to be spam with forged headers. If I were the type of person who makes assumptions, I'd assume someone on those lists was trying to make a point. -- Robin Lynn Frank | Director of Operations | Paradigm-Omega, LLC Email acceptance policy: http://paradigm-omega.com/email_policy.html Our current s$p%a&m-t*r#a^p: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
