On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 01:23:26AM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote: > on Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 12:43:16PM +0100, Karsten M. Self ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > The unstated assumption is that alternative spam mitigations don't > > work. > I stand corrected: this is a stated assumption:
list owner: i'm sorry, is karsten going to offer constructive suggestions, or is he just going to whine endlessly to tmda-users? at some point don't you need to say enough? karsten: you use a content filter. good for you. tell it to give a high spam score to tmda messages and a low spam score to messages with message-id's you've recently sent (i assume it already does). tada, you're done. personally i think your time would be better spent coming up with a better tool then a twiki to maintain info on sco.vs.ibm. but apparently you don't listen to reason there either. kevin -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] i wouldn't mind what that says; http://ie.suberic.net/~kevin/cgi-bin/blog paper never refused ink.
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
