on Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 12:43:16PM +0100, Karsten M. Self ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> The unstated assumption is that alternative spam mitigations don't
> work.
I stand corrected: this is a stated assumption:
http://tmda.net/
2. Content-based filters can't distinguish SPAM from legitimate mail
with sufficient accuracy.
What is the supporting basis for this statement?
Peace.
--
Karsten M. Self <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
What Part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?
GNU/Linux web browsing mini review: Galeon. Kicks ass.
http://galeon.sourceforge.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
