Jim Ramsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > TMDA 1.0.x and one for compatibility with TMDA 1.1.x. I want to do > this ASAP, as 1.1 is steadily moving away from 1.0. > > That said, there will be a huge overlap of code between the two, and > when I add a new feature to one, I don't want it to be a huge chore > to add the same feature again to the other.
I personally think trying to maintain features in two different branches is counterproductive. The heavy administrative overhead will eventually start to discourage you from working on tmda-cgi. So, I would only work on (meaning new features) one base of code. If you don't feel tmda-cgi is feature complete yet, you could only support one branch of TMDA (probably 1.0.x) for now. Later when TMDA 1.1.x is further along, tmda-cgi will be as well, and that might be a good time to do your own feature freeze, and focus on supporting TMDA 1.1.x. -- The only emperor is the emperor of ice-cream. _________________________________________________ tmda-workers mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-workers
