Thats what Prasanthi. I am also asking why there is a communication gap? When
did I suggest ODDP should not be discussed??And whats the statement MATTER IS
IN SUPREME COURT? I exactly asked why the previous MoM on ODDP was not
discussed BECAUSE it was clearly mentioned in the previous MoM that Suresh is
also working on this and we left WDP on Kasyap. We (or atleast I, myself was )
were under the impression that he(Kasyap) is still trying to look for places
and bamboo sheet costs etc. Now this thing you added after I asked. Quite
naturally I was interested in knowing what happened w.r.t.WDP as Suresh clearly
mentioned that we have to act fast and we knew kasyap is an able person to do
this thing. This update on NOT TAKING UP WDP was never mentioned. So I was in
no position to know if it had been discussed at all.
In fact, I did check the list of members and when I saw only one new member
(rather friend)was there, I was wondering when there were no new members and
the discussion went with old members only, why something pending was not
discussed. If you could have mentioned that in the MoM, I would not have asked
about that.
Abput ODDP, it was Suresh who proposed that we will start with kids below
2yrs of age and the team was Suresh and Ratan. In your mail, Suresh is not
featuring at all whereas you have mentioned Kasyap, Ratan and Sundar will
concentrate on distributing babies dresses of age below 3 years. Again I had a
thought that probably this is a new development and for some reasons Suresh is
not mentioned and Ratan is mentioned (we both took the responsibility of this
in 15th meeting and we both were absent on 22nd meeting). Quite naturally I
thought this is something new and I asked when there is a team for this, others
can also join and take this further. But the mention of names forced me to
think Suresh will not be a part as originally discussed and decided.
It was not a monthly meeting, that I could easily understood with my limited
knowledge. But when the main objective of the meeting could not be achieved
(knowing and introducing new members), I expected that the regular members can
discuss about the development of already discussed issues in the previous
meeting. Thats what I wanted and NOT THE WAY you felt that I suggested it is in
supreme court and it shall not be discussed. As per my thinking, if they WERE
DISCUSSED then the development on WDP would have been informed without me
asking for it and Suresh's name would have been there in the ODDP.
And on the last point of me asking that if the meeting was called for because
you thought nothing concrete was discussed, IS NOT RIDICULOUS because instead
of discussing on the growth and development of already discussed points, we
discussed HOW AND WHOM of something already discussed and not mentioning
anything about a time-bound project like WDP.
I hope, after this mail, you wont feel that question was ridiculous. And if
that was my intention, I would have called you on phone and asked about it. It
was not personal question, rather it was general, The mail was addressed to you
because the MoM was prepared by you and you were the seniormost member present.
Ratan
---------------------------------
Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell?
Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos.
