Jon Stevens wrote:
> on 1/24/01 10:06 AM, "Larry Isaacs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > It should be noted that when this plan comes up for a vote, a +1 by a
> > committer will constitute a commitment not only to helping with the release,
> > but to provide maintenance support beyond the release.
>
> I'm not sure that I agree with this. What if I want to state my approval,
> but don't want to help out?
>
By the current understanding of the voting rules, you would say "+0" to mean
this. If you disagreed, you would vote "-0" (I don't think this is a good idea,
but I'm not going to try to block it) or "-1" (this is a bad idea and should not
be done).
Under appropriate circumstances (valid reasoning/alternative supplied, decision
which requires consensus) a -1 vote is a veto, but release plans don't fall into
that category (they require at least 3 +1s, and more +1s than -1s).
>
> -jon
>
Craig
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
