> Remy Maucherat wrote:
> >
> > > With my design, you still need one thread/request but only for the
> > > time required to process container.invoke()
> >
> > In the real world, the servlets and JSPs are the thing which take by far
the
> > most time to complete, so I'm not sure you wouldn't end up spending a
lot of
> > time in the threaded part.
> >
>
>  There was a long discussion on the advanced-servlets list
> a while back. That discussion concluded that the NIO looked
> most promising for:
>
>  - Cleanly waiting for persistent connections (which take
>    up a connector thread but don't really need to) You
>    can kinda sorta do this already with the existing java.io
>    classes, but NIO is better. This is a relatively easy
>    win.
>
>  - Serving static content. It's not just the non-blocking
>    io, serving from memory mapped files is a beguilingly
>    easy (but maybe not always the best) way to improve file
>    serving performance.
>
>  Using NIO to reduce the time service() needed to tie up
> a thread is fun, but seemed unlikely to help very much in
> practice. And of course the optimized char conversion
> stuff, but that's obviously useful and therefore boring.

I agree on both the points above.
Especially the first one actually, since you can avoid wasting a thread on
waiting, and use all of them to do active work if needed.
For the second point, Catalina uses a servlet to do the static files
serving. I suppose the connector could do some optimization and serve some
resources itself, but that's a bit complex, and not as clean as the current
solution.

I like that difference between a fun optimization and a useful optimization
:)
At the moment, a lot of useful optimization work still has yet to be done.

>  I'm pretty sure newesh versions of Jetty include a first
> pass at integrating NIO, so anybody that's interested
> might want to take a look.
>
>  There's some fairly bogus (but still kinda interesting)
> benchmark results using NIO-like routines to serve static
> files at distributopia.com. (Sun says no NIO-bmarks until
> it's out of beta, so I used Matt Welsh's NBIO code)

I didn't know. They're annoying ...

Remy


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to