Draft 0.3 vim proposal. http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=df6hcjb2_10f934gh
Please let me know if you need edit access. Thanks, -Brian On 4/30/07, Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Brian Gupta wrote: > Updating "vi" should be a seperate project. vim can be intruduced without > any namespace collision. We are still leaving the door open for refactoring > vi to use vim or one of the other clones at a later date. > > One additional note. vim's ex and view should be called by using "vim -e" > and "vim -R". This way we don't create any new "artifacts". (Alternatively > named ex and view) It will be cleaner down the road, if you ever decide to > merge vi and vim. I think that is the best way to approach this. It is similar to how ksh upgrade is being approached - first introduce ksh93 then look at how to make /usr/bin/ksh the new thing. -- Darren J Moffat
_______________________________________________ tools-discuss mailing list tools-discuss@opensolaris.org
