Valerie Bubb Fenwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, 25 Oct 2007, Darren J Moffat wrote: > >> Valerie Bubb Fenwick wrote: >>> On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Bill Sommerfeld wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 15:00 -0700, Valerie Bubb Fenwick wrote: >>>>> * Must have a valid RM (Responsible Manager) and IE (Initial >>>>> Evaluator), and a sensible 1-line description >>>>> (this gets tricky for projects that are purely externally >>>>> contributed - we haven't come up with a good solution for >>>>> that yet) >>>> while it's a stretch, how about "responsible community" as a strawman >>>> analog for RM. >>>> >>>> no, you wouldn't send all the RM mail to the whole community; rather, >>>> the leadership of the community could fill the role of the "RM" for >>>> things like identifying likely people to fix high-priority bugs.. >>> >>> That's a great idea... and now that many of has learned that each >>> community is meant to have an actual facilitator, we could (perhaps) >>> use that person's email address. >> >> I would rather it wasn't the actual email address of the person but an alias >> for the community facilitator (which we don't have but probably should) eg >> [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > That makes sense, but as far as I know, we don't have any mechansism for > doing this on the site right now. That would be a useful topic to bring > up on the website alias. >
I'd add to that, that under this model it seems like it would make sense for the IE/default-asignee to be <community-or-project>-bugs@ by default. -- Rich _______________________________________________ tools-discuss mailing list tools-discuss@opensolaris.org
